Re: extra constraints on has_many relationship (patch)

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/06/08]

From: Edward J. Sabol
Subject: Re: extra constraints on has_many relationship (patch)
Date: 21:53 on 08 Jun 2004
> Of course there are probably other ways to achieve the above
> results, but this seems to me like a simple and clean way of
> handling a common situation.
>
> Comments/Questions?

Seems pretty useful to me. Semantically speaking though, wouldn't it make
more sense for the constraint to be a hash reference than an array reference?
The code could/should accept both, but I would document it as a hash
reference.

Re: extra constraints on has_many relationship (patch)
Edward J. Sabol 21:53 on 08 Jun 2004

Generated at 11:35 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52