Re: Interesting issue with create()

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/10/24]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: Interesting issue with create()
Date: 19:24 on 24 Oct 2004

On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 13:50, Drew Taylor wrote:
> My first thought is to patch create() to not accept values for the
> primary key(s).

Not all tables use an auto_increment or sequence, so specifying primary
keys is necessary.

> Can I set a constraint for the PK?

Sure, that should work fine.

- Perrin

(message missing)

Interesting issue with create()
Drew Taylor 17:50 on 24 Oct 2004

Re: Interesting issue with create()
Perrin Harkins 19:24 on 24 Oct 2004

Re: Interesting issue with create()
Jess Robinson 10:24 on 30 Oct 2004

Re: Interesting issue with create()
Drew Taylor 17:14 on 30 Oct 2004

Re: Interesting issue with create()
Jess Robinson 06:37 on 31 Oct 2004

Re: Interesting issue with create()
Drew Taylor 18:07 on 31 Oct 2004

Re: Interesting issue with create()
Lance A. Brown 18:21 on 31 Oct 2004

Re: Interesting issue with create()
Jess Robinson 06:31 on 02 Nov 2004

Re: Interesting issue with create()
Jess Robinson 06:28 on 02 Nov 2004