Re: CDBI::Relationship::IsA issues with TEMP columns

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/24]

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Peter Speltz wrote:
> Is that clear enough?  It seems what is happening is TEMP columns in base class
> aren't getting mapped properly to sub class.  Or more precisely they don't seem
> to be getting mapped at all since the sub class thinks they are in it's table.
> Maybe this is good or on purpose I don't know or i just am doing something
> stupid, but it's stopping me from being able to do what i want to do.

I am stuck for free time at the moment (new job, lots of (unwanted) 
learning how to sysadmin windows and linux and bind and sendmail) so I 
would suggest you avoid using TEMP columns with CDB::R::Isa until Richard 
and I fix something to make it use something else.

Any patches welcome of course. As is a Test::More style test we can run 
with some example data, etc.

regards,

A. who should be able to get back to his coding in a few weeks once he has 
settled in his new job and finished building his father in laws webshop

        -- 
        Aaron J Trevena - Perl Hacker, Kung Fu Geek, Internet Consultant
AutoDia --- Automatic UML and HTML Specifications from Perl, C++ 
and Any Datasource with a Handler.     http://droogs.org/autodia