Re: Abstract Search question

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/12/22]

From: Peter Speltz
Subject: Re: Abstract Search question
Date: 18:56 on 22 Dec 2004
--- Andrew Hartford <ahartford@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:

> Hello again, 
> It occurred to me that although I can't express A and (B or C) it might be 
> possible to change the logic but get the same result. 
> 
> I refreshed my knowledge of boolean algebra and now see that the equivalent
> of 
> the above, which _can_ be expressed in SQL::Abstract, is :
> (A and B) or (A and C)
> 
> That solves my problem. There is a good writeup of boolean algebra on 
> everything2 
> (http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=413665&lastnode_id=520379).
> 
> Andy
> 

cool.  thanks. how do you express (A and B) or (A and C) in SQL::Abstract. Its
not coming to me at moment. 


=====
pjs


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more. 
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com

(message missing)

Abstract Search question
Andrew Hartford 23:13 on 21 Dec 2004

Re: Abstract Search question
Peter Speltz 07:22 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: Abstract Search question
Peter Speltz 07:41 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: Abstract Search question
Andrew Hartford 15:16 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: Abstract Search question
Andrew Hartford 18:46 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: Abstract Search question
Peter Speltz 18:56 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: Abstract Search question
Andrew Hartford 15:21 on 23 Dec 2004

Re: Abstract Search question
Tim Bunce 16:39 on 23 Dec 2004

Generated at 12:15 on 16 Jan 2005 by mariachi v0.52