Re: many2many

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/11]

From: William Ross
Subject: Re: many2many
Date: 19:38 on 11 Apr 2005
On 11 Apr 2005, at 20:17, Tony Bowden wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:58:11PM +0100, William Ross wrote:
>> If i remember rightly, the moniker of a class defaults to the name of
>> its data table if no other moniker is declared. I don't think this is
>> in the docs.
>
> No. It defaults to the moniker of the class name. As in 
> $class->moniker.
> This enables you to do a reasonably good job of hiding the bizarre 
> naming
> convention that some DBA foisted upon your organisation.

oop. sorry. my applications need Keyword::Link and Group::Link to have 
different monikers so I always declare them. It's a long time since I 
had to think about it :(

The rest of the diagnosis is ok, i think.

will

many2many
Barry Dancis 16:46 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: many2many
William Ross 18:58 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: many2many
Tony Bowden 19:17 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: many2many
William Ross 19:38 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: many2many
Barry Dancis 14:43 on 12 Apr 2005

Re: many2many
William Ross 17:23 on 12 Apr 2005

Re: many2many
Barry Dancis 15:43 on 12 Apr 2005

Generated at 12:49 on 16 Apr 2005 by mariachi v0.52