Re: Can C::D::AutoLoader work with C::D::MSSQL? Is it a good idea?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/20]

From: Sebastian Riedel
Subject: Re: Can C::D::AutoLoader work with C::D::MSSQL? Is it a good idea?
Date: 18:03 on 20 Apr 2005
Am 20.04.2005 um 18:23 schrieb Kingsley Kerce:

> Kevin Old writes:
>> This works quite well, but I've got lots of tables to setup in the IVR
>> namespace and I'd heard about Class::DBI::AutoLoader.
>
> Also consider Class::DBI::Loader.
>
> Does anyone know offhand the significant differences in features
> between Class::DBI::Loader and Class::DBI::AutoLoader?

Well, i'm not very objective i guess. ;)

Class::DBI::Loader has much more magic, and does stuff like relation 
detection.
It's also more actively maintained, last AutoLoader release is from 
2003!

And it's the default in Catalyst and Maypole...

--
sebastian

Re: Can C::D::AutoLoader work with C::D::MSSQL? Is it a good idea?
Sebastian Riedel 18:03 on 20 Apr 2005

Generated at 09:29 on 27 Apr 2005 by mariachi v0.52