Re: multiple order_by clauses?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/06/15]

From: d. Taylor Singletary
Subject: Re: multiple order_by clauses?
Date: 19:12 on 15 Jun 2005
Thanks, makes perfect sense. Glad that it's a direct text transposition
on that stuff.

d. Taylor Singletary

On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 19:49 +0100, William Ross wrote:
> you can put any string in the order_by clause.
> 
> 
> On 15 Jun 2005, at 19:22, d. Taylor Singletary wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was wondering if it's possible to specify multiple order_by  
> > clauses as
> > you can in standard SQL, where there are fallbacks in ordering in the
> > event that the first order_by qualifier is the same?
> >
> > The equivalent of:
> >
> > SELECT CATEGORY.NAME FROM CATEGORY ORDER BY CATEGORY.RANK,  
> > CATEGORY.NAME
> 
> You can supply any string as an order_by parameter, so long as it  
> makes sense when the SQL is assembled. The sql template for search is  
> just
> 
>      SELECT __ESSENTIAL__
>      FROM   __TABLE__
>      WHERE  %s
> 
> and if there's an order_by parameter it's appended to the WHERE  
> clause (at cdbi line 1096 ish):
> 
>      $frag .= " ORDER BY $search_opts->{order_by}".
> 
> So I often use
> 
>      $class->search(%criteria, { order_by => 'date DESC' };
> 
> and this should also work:
> 
>      $class->search(%criteria, { order_by => 'rank, name' };
> 
> You should only need to resort to set_sql if there is a join  
> involved, and I don't think you should need to sort in perl at all.
> 
> best
> 
> Will
> 

multiple order_by clauses?
d. Taylor Singletary 18:22 on 15 Jun 2005

Re: multiple order_by clauses?
William Ross 18:49 on 15 Jun 2005

Re: multiple order_by clauses?
d. Taylor Singletary 19:12 on 15 Jun 2005

Generated at 16:37 on 28 Jul 2005 by mariachi v0.52