Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI::Frozen?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/10/26]

From: Dave Howorth
Subject: Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI::Frozen?
Date: 10:23 on 26 Oct 2005
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 08:46 +0100, Will Hawes wrote:
> Wouldn't using only.pm accomplish the same thing?

There's a difference if you normally use cpan to install modules. Having
a separate frozen module means that cpan can load it. To use only, you
have to install each version 'by hand' in the traditional way.

If you then consider the case where the 'you' above is not really you,
but some person using some module you wrote that uses CDBI, then you
have no control over what mechanism some person prefers to use to
install software. If it's cpan, and you've chosen to go the only route,
they probably won't even notice there's a problem until they run their
application, and the diagnosis is buried way down in what should be a
black box to them. Naming the frozen module as your dependency avoids
this and seems like a good idea to me.

Cheers, Dave


_______________________________________________
ClassDBI mailing list
ClassDBI@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
http://lists.digitalcraftsmen.net/mailman/listinfo/classdbi

[CDBI] Class::DBI::Frozen?
Cees Hek 21:56 on 25 Oct 2005

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI::Frozen?
Christopher H. Laco 22:18 on 25 Oct 2005

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI::Frozen?
Matt S Trout 23:15 on 25 Oct 2005

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI::Frozen?
Christopher H. Laco 23:44 on 25 Oct 2005

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI::Frozen?
Will Hawes 07:46 on 26 Oct 2005

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI::Frozen?
Dave Howorth 10:23 on 26 Oct 2005

Generated at 09:28 on 02 Nov 2005 by mariachi v0.52