Re: Keywords

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/21]

JupiterHost.Net wrote:
> 
> 
> Anthony Gardner wrote:
> 
>> Can someone tell me why sex, sexy, suck and child 

obviously those are taken out of context :)

> hmmm, not 100% sure but:
> 
>  sex and sexxy describe perl and mod_perl in general :)
>  suck might be there to describe other bloaty clunky wanna be's :)
>  For instance say I'm looking for a solution and I type:
>    "Why does PHP suck and mod_perl doesn't"
>    "Does mod_perl suck?" (answer is NO BTW ;p)
> 
>   child perhaps for child processes?

That's correct.

And don't forget: http://scroogie.de/pix/data/media/2/mod_perl.jpg :)

You can blame me for that keywords selection. Those keywords were added at 
the time when search engines were looking at keywords to make up the 
ranking. I just saw other sites using those and I've copied from them. I'm 
not sure if those are relevant anymore these days.

Let us know if this is no longer useful and we will remove those or 
replace with something better.


        -- 
        __________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@xxxxxx.xxx http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

-- 
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html