RE: compile problems

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/12/17]

From: Barksdale, Ray
Subject: RE: compile problems
Date: 21:05 on 17 Dec 2004

 Built my own perl in /usr/local. Made sure they weren't comingling.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:news@xxx.xxxxx.xxx] On Behalf Of Joe Schaefer
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 12:28 PM
> To: modperl@xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: compile problems
> 
> "Barksdale, Ray" <barksdale@xxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > /usr/bin/ld:
> > 
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.5/x86_64-linux/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLo
> ader.a(DynaLoa
> > der.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making 
> a shared object;
> > recompile with -fPIC
> > 
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.5/x86_64-linux/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLo
> ader.a: could
> > not read symbols: Bad value
> 
> I think this means Fedora's DynaLoader.a file needs to be 
> (re)compiled with -fpic (or -fPIC).  Look for "-Duseshrplib"
> and/or "cccdlflags='-fPIC'" in perl -V.
> 
> -- 
> Joe Schaefer
> 

ok. Had "cccdlflags='-fPIC'". Just set "useshrplib=true".
Rebuilt 5.8.5, tested ok, installed.
Built mod_perl 1.99_17. Built ok. Failed two tests: apr-ext/finfo.t and
apr-ext/util.
Have to figure that out in a bit. Work has interrupted.

Will take Stas's suggestion and try current svn.

Thanks all.

> 
> -- 
> Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
> Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
> List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
> 

*****CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*****
This e-mail and any files or attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender at the above e-mail address and delete it and all copies
from your system.

        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

(message missing)

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 16:57 on 17 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Joe Schaefer 18:27 on 17 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 18:38 on 17 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 19:05 on 17 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 19:26 on 17 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 21:05 on 17 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 21:19 on 17 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 23:38 on 17 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 23:44 on 17 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 15:19 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 20:27 on 22 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 20:37 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 21:16 on 22 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 22:01 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 22:22 on 22 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 23:07 on 22 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 00:01 on 23 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 22:50 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 23:01 on 28 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 23:15 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 23:17 on 28 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 23:50 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Joe Schaefer 01:29 on 29 Dec 2004

RE: compile problems
Barksdale, Ray 16:59 on 29 Dec 2004

Re: compile problems
Stas Bekman 17:21 on 29 Dec 2004