Re: Is there a "PerlPreForkHandler"?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/12/27]

From: Patrick LeBoutillier
Subject: Re: Is there a "PerlPreForkHandler"?
Date: 15:06 on 27 Dec 2004
> Will it take the same configuration files as the Tinc VPN, for
> encryption purposes?

I don't know about that, but that's why I decided to use Apache as the
back end.
Apache can provide encryption with https, authentication with BasicAuth
and/or
client certificates and all sorts of other security features that I will
not have to
re-implement.



>
>
>
> --
>
> David L Nicol
> You're striving for harmony, and, if you try to take
>  too much, you'll come to grief.  -- Michael Redmond
>
>


        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

Is there a "PerlPreForkHandler"?
Patrick LeBoutillier 20:11 on 26 Dec 2004

Re: Is there a "PerlPreForkHandler"?
Stas Bekman 20:25 on 26 Dec 2004

Re: Is there a "PerlPreForkHandler"?
Patrick LeBoutillier 00:18 on 27 Dec 2004

Re: Is there a "PerlPreForkHandler"?
Stas Bekman 00:36 on 27 Dec 2004

Re: Is there a "PerlPreForkHandler"?
David Nicol 03:26 on 27 Dec 2004

Re: Is there a "PerlPreForkHandler"?
Patrick LeBoutillier 15:06 on 27 Dec 2004

Generated at 12:15 on 16 Jan 2005 by mariachi v0.52