Re: [mp1] Linking confusion

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/12/31]

From: William McKee
Subject: Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
Date: 00:28 on 31 Dec 2004

On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 07:00:36PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >I'm guessing that this goes for any libperl.so, e.g. libperl.so.5.6 or
> >libperl.so.5.8. If so then it would explain the weird behavior that I've
> >been getting when compiling mod_perl.
> 
> Normally in addition to libperl.so.5.8 there will be a symlink to 
> libperl.so. Applications normally link against .so and not .so.x.y, so an 
> upgrade of that library will be possible w/o requiring the compilation of 
> the former.

Hmm, that's what I thought too and was creating a symlink from
/usr/lib/libperl.so to the newly created one. I was still getting
strange behavior though so moved them all out of /usr/lib. Seems a bit
better now.


Thanks,
William

        -- 
        Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com

-- 
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

(message missing)

[mp1] Linking confusion
William McKee 20:53 on 30 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
Stas Bekman 22:57 on 30 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
William McKee 23:56 on 30 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
Stas Bekman 00:00 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
William McKee 00:28 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
Stas Bekman 00:32 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
William McKee 15:48 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
Stas Bekman 16:35 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
William McKee 17:01 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
Stas Bekman 19:02 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
William McKee 04:46 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
Michael Robinton 21:14 on 01 Jan 2005

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
William McKee 20:08 on 31 Dec 2004

Re: [mp1] Linking confusion
Stas Bekman 21:06 on 31 Dec 2004