Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/01/16]

From: sofadmin
Subject: Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Date: 17:49 on 16 Jan 2005

>
> sofadmin@xxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
>> Interesting, your comments on CGI::Session vs Apache::Session as I've
>> had
>> nothing but trouble with Apache::Session::File -- session data
>> inconsistently being written to the file.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that. Did you mention those problems to the author or
> bring it up on the mod_perl list? Were you using just
> Apache::Session::File or Apache::Session::Flex? I suspect that it was
> having issues with locking the files so maybe trying another locking
> mechanism (using Flex) might have helped. But that's just a guess.

I only use the ::File implementation with a few sites where traffic is
fairly minimal & I didn't think the overhead of a MySQL db was worth it.
I'm not familiar with ::Flex. I will check it out. Thanks for the advice.

Sys

(message missing)

CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Octavian Rasnita 05:29 on 15 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Sean Davis 12:53 on 15 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Michael Peters 13:15 on 15 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
sofadmin 02:12 on 16 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Michael Peters 02:19 on 16 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Todd Finney 02:57 on 16 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Perrin Harkins 18:56 on 17 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
sofadmin 17:49 on 16 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
William McKee 19:45 on 17 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Perrin Harkins 20:16 on 17 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
William McKee 20:48 on 17 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Octavian Rasnita 06:36 on 18 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
David Hodgkinson 13:55 on 15 Jan 2005

Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
Todd Finney 23:58 on 17 Jan 2005