RE: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/01/16]

From: Tom Gazzini
Subject: RE: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Date: 02:02 on 16 Jan 2005

How does this help if the server hosts only one sites which is base on, say,
Mason, and where every page request would require mod_perl?

-Tom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sofadmin@xxxxxxx.xxx [mailto:sofadmin@xxxxxxx.xxx]
> Sent: 16 January 2005 01:31
> To: modperl@xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
> 
> .
> >
> > Probably the biggest bang for the buck with the least effort or code
> > changes is to set up a lightweight (i.e. non-mod_perl) reverse proxy
> httpd
> > in front of the httpd that is running mod_perl:
> >
> 
> Would you recommend squid or mod_proxy?
>

[BENCHMARK] Server Resources
sofadmin 20:43 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Skylos 21:08 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Michael Peters 21:16 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Skylos 21:22 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
sofadmin 21:42 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Skylos 23:23 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Rob Bloodgood 23:35 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Perrin Harkins 20:39 on 17 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Larry Leszczynski 21:45 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Stas Bekman 23:29 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
sofadmin 01:31 on 16 Jan 2005

RE: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Tom Gazzini 02:02 on 16 Jan 2005

RE: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Todd Finney 02:48 on 16 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Perrin Harkins 19:08 on 17 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
Kyle Dawkins 22:52 on 14 Jan 2005

Re: [BENCHMARK] Server Resources
sofadmin 00:46 on 16 Jan 2005