RE: Problem on RedHat Enterprise 3.0

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/01/20]

It's the whole sticking with the vendor for support thing. We have a
support contract with RedHat and every time I've gone away from any
"stock" RPM they always come back with "well... You know you... Blah
blah blah.." Unfortunately, I'm stuck and am just following orders..
"get that version working".

Thanks for all the suggestions everyone. Just got back in from the flu
and will try to digest all this and see what I can come up with for a
solution. It's been a year since I worked with mod_perl so there's a
slight learning curve to go through again.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:perrin@xxxx.xxx]=20
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 8:15 PM
> To: Young, Darren
> Cc: modperl@xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: Problem on RedHat Enterprise 3.0
>=20
> Young, Darren wrote:
> > I installed their (RedHat) mod_perl rpm (1.99_09)
>=20
> I understand that you're trying to stick with your vendor's=20
> packaging system, but that's a really old version of mod_perl=20
> 2.  It was released about two years ago, and there have been=20
> two years worth of bug fixes since then.  It's hard for the=20
> people on the list to effectively support users who are=20
> running what is essentially an alpha version of mod_perl 2. =20
> Please consider building your own RPM of the most recent=20
> version, or bugging Red Hat to package something more up-to-date.
>=20
> > [Wed Jan 19 14:34:18 2005] [error] [client 67.184.77.67]=20
> Can't locate=20
> > object method "print" via package "Apache::RequestRec" at=20
> >=20
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Apache/Status
> > .pm
> > line 144.!
>=20
> Can you tell us what version of Apache::Status that is?  I'm=20
> not sure there even was an Apache::Status port for mod_perl 2=20
> at the time.  Could this be left over from a mod_perl 1=20
> installation you have on that box?
>=20
> - Perrin
>=20