Re: contention for require()'d code library

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/08]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: contention for require()'d code library
Date: 16:34 on 08 Feb 2005
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:28 -0500, Matthew Berk wrote:
> Besides not keeping strict, which I'm doing intentionally to support a 
> bit of older code, am I violating a fundamental rule of mod_perl around 
> namespace contention?

http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/troubleshooting.html#Undefined_subroutine__Apache__ROOT__perl__test_2epl__some_function_called_at

I would highly recommend porting your code to perl5-style modules with
packages and strict/warnings.

- Perrin

(message missing)

contention for require()'d code library
Matthew Berk 16:28 on 08 Feb 2005

Re: contention for require()'d code library
Perrin Harkins 16:34 on 08 Feb 2005

Re: contention for require()'d code library
Joe Schaefer 16:52 on 08 Feb 2005

Re: contention for require()'d code library
Matthew Berk 17:01 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: contention for require()'d code library
Perrin Harkins 17:09 on 10 Feb 2005

Generated at 11:21 on 20 Feb 2005 by mariachi v0.52