Re: preferred LB methods

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/10]

From: Malcolm J Harwood
Subject: Re: preferred LB methods
Date: 17:47 on 10 Feb 2005

On Thursday 10 February 2005 11:54 am, Matthew Berk wrote:

> Am fresh off the chapters dealing with load balancing in Practical
> mod_perl, but wanted to ask if folks have had any success using LVS in
> lieu of the recommended Squid 

Well, I can't claim success yet, as we haven't gone into production but the 
project I'm working on for my employer uses LVS. So far it's working well 
though. Fallover is an issue though (LVS doesn't inherently have any ability 
to detect when a machine goes down and stop forwarding to it), but there's 
solutions to that.

> We're graduating from round-robin DNS to something more intelligent, 

What sort of intelligence do you need?

At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Boysenberry Payne 21:01 on 08 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Barry Hoggard 23:02 on 08 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Boysenberry Payne 09:14 on 09 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Boysenberry Payne 07:46 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Barry Hoggard 18:39 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Geoffrey Young 19:01 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Barry Hoggard 19:03 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Boysenberry Payne 22:54 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Boysenberry Payne 11:21 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: At the end of my rope with apache and mod_perl
Boysenberry Payne 14:30 on 10 Feb 2005

preferred LB methods
Matthew Berk 16:54 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: preferred LB methods
Peter Leonard 17:14 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: preferred LB methods
Geoffrey Young 17:15 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: preferred LB methods
Malcolm J Harwood 17:47 on 10 Feb 2005