Re: shared memory

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/03/15]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: shared memory
Date: 20:14 on 15 Mar 2005

On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 15:05 -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> i've found sqlite3 to be waaaay faster than mysql for simple 
> transactions and, while there can be delays from locking, the speed 
> improvements of querying more than make up for it in the instances I've 
> tested

Sounds good.  I'll see if I can do some simple benchmarks in the next
few days.

- Perrin

(message missing)

shared memory
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= 16:35 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Jonathan Vanasco 16:37 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= 17:07 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= 22:53 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Martin Moss 17:47 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Perrin Harkins 18:04 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Jonathan Vanasco 19:11 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Perrin Harkins 19:48 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Dan Sully 19:53 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
jonathan vanasco 00:30 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Jonathan Vanasco 20:05 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Perrin Harkins 20:14 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= 22:26 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Perrin Harkins 22:31 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= 23:26 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Jonathan Vanasco 23:40 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Eric Wilhelm 23:50 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Perrin Harkins 00:29 on 16 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Scott Gifford 03:29 on 16 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
William McKee 14:36 on 18 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Perrin Harkins 00:30 on 16 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
jonathan vanasco 00:40 on 16 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Perrin Harkins 00:50 on 16 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Ofer Nave 01:20 on 16 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
jonathan vanasco 01:56 on 16 Mar 2005

Re: shared memory
Perrin Harkins 01:06 on 17 Mar 2005