Re: [mp2] Possible bug in Apache::Reload
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2005/03/25]
Chris Warren wrote:
> -------------8<---------- Start Bug Report ------------8<----------
> 1. Problem Description:
>
> I believe I've found a bug in Apache::Reload. It shows up when you're
> using the ReloadTouchFile option -- the effect is that the server gives
> you a 500 error when the touchfile has not been modified. I believe this
> is a result of the following code:
>
> I suspect this problem would happen on Linux as well, but I'm
> encountering it on a Windows machine. This is using Apache 2.0.53 and
> Apache::Reload 0.09. (Apache::Reload was installed by Activestate's PPM
> tool as part of mod_perl 2.0.0-RC4).
>
> I believe the problem is the same as described in revision 69750
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=69750&view=rev), where the code
> was returning 1 instead of an Apache constant.
>
>
> Here's the code that I believe is responsible:
>
> 96 if ($TouchFile) {
> 97 warn "Checking mtime of $TouchFile\n" if $DEBUG;
> 98 my $touch_mtime = (stat $TouchFile)[9] || return 1;
> 99 return 1 unless $touch_mtime > $TouchTime;
> 100 $TouchTime = $touch_mtime;
> 101 open my $fh, $TouchFile or die "Can't open '$TouchFile': $!";
> 102 $TouchModules = <$fh>;
> 103 chomp $TouchModules if $TouchModules;
> 104 }
>
> When I replaced "return 1" on line 99 with "return Apache::OK", the
> modules I was using ran successfully, without the 500 error.
>
> (I don't know whether or not the "return 1" on line 98 should also be
> changed.)
Absolutely right, Chris: both should be return Apache::OK. Care to post a
patch here after you've tested it? (since we don't have a test for it, at
least not yet)
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@xxxxxx.xxx http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
 |
 |
Re: [mp2] Possible bug in Apache::Reload
Stas Bekman 22:59 on 25 Mar 2005
|