Re: Configuration for redundancy?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/05]

From: jonathan vanasco
Subject: Re: Configuration for redundancy?
Date: 23:45 on 05 Apr 2005
I'll  second Zawodny's book.   It's a quick read.

	http://www.bookpool.com/sm/0596003064

OT, A decent backup scheme mentioned in it is to run a slave on a 
separate machine, and then do all your backups off that (as you wont 
have to shut the main machine down, and it will resync up when brought 
back online)

He explains it much better than me.


On Apr 5, 2005, at 7:13 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:

> It's a bit different from just clustering an existing MySQL database.
> It involves using an entirely separate table type which is designed 
> just
> for clustering.  Suitable for some applications, but most of what 
> people
> think of as database clustering would be easier to do using replication
> (which MySQL supports) and some kind of external failover.  Zawodny's
> MySQL book covers the subject well.
>
> - Perrin
>

Configuration for redundancy?
Chris 22:24 on 05 Apr 2005

RE: Configuration for redundancy?
Goehring, Chuck, RCI - San Diego 22:58 on 05 Apr 2005

RE: Configuration for redundancy?
Perrin Harkins 23:13 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: Configuration for redundancy?
jonathan vanasco 23:45 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: Configuration for redundancy?
Dzuy Nguyen 02:35 on 06 Apr 2005

Generated at 14:43 on 11 Apr 2005 by mariachi v0.52