SER1 Re: 107" SW seat
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2004/11/16]
-------------------------------1100573588
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
HI Tom C,
Your terminology is correct, the "second" seat is the one I have often
missing. I regard the very rear ones as more of an accessory or "jump seat". Here,
we might call them "third row" although they are actually opposed.
I haven't checked the parts book on either one, S1 or S2 to see if same as
Nick mentioned. Still amazed why they are removed, I supposed the vehicle
moves down the pecking order and becomes the "farm hack" and more cargo and fewer
passengers are the order of the day.
Tom Bache
-------------------------------1100573588
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><HEAD>
<META charset=3DUS-ASCII http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; cha=
rset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff=
f">
<DIV>HI Tom C,</DIV>
<DIV>Your terminology is correct, the "second" seat is the one I have often=20=
missing. I regard the very rear ones as more of an accessory or "jump seat".=
Here, we might call them "third row" although they are actually=20=
opposed.</DIV>
<DIV>I haven't checked the parts book on either one, S1 or S2 to see i=
f same as Nick mentioned. Still amazed why they are removed, I suppose=
d the vehicle moves down the pecking order and becomes the "farm hack" and m=
ore cargo and fewer passengers are the order of the day.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Tom Bache</DIV></BODY></HTML>
-------------------------------1100573588--
To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
 |
(message missing)
|
 |
 |
SER1 Re: 107" SW seat
TBache9248 02:53 on 16 Nov 2004
|