Re: Using Scalar::Util

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/06/23]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: Using Scalar::Util
Date: 18:36 on 23 Jun 2004

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:35:17PM -0400, Drew Taylor wrote:
> And Scalar::Util is in the same distribution as List::Util so there is 
> no extra dependency. Are you interested in a patch? The performance hit 
> is minimal as demonstrated by my (hopefully not flawed) benchmark posted 
> earlier.

First I'd like to see a test case that would fail with the current
implementation and will pass after your patch, so I know what we're
actually dealing with here...

Tony

Using Scalar::Util
Drew Taylor 13:48 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Perrin Harkins 14:10 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Drew Taylor 14:32 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 15:53 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Drew Taylor 16:43 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Tony Bowden 16:53 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Perrin Harkins 16:59 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Drew Taylor 17:35 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Tony Bowden 18:36 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Drew Taylor 19:01 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Takes Tea at Half Past Three 17:40 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Drew Taylor 17:51 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Takes Tea at Half Past Three 18:02 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Drew Taylor 18:27 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: Using Scalar::Util
Edward J. Sabol 18:27 on 23 Jun 2004