Re: Better handling of constraint failures?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/08/12]

From: Clayton L. Scott
Subject: Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Date: 20:04 on 12 Aug 2004

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Daniel Collis Puro wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Here's the solution I came up with: Is this something that can make it
> into Class::DBI proper?

[snip]

This looks interesting but I don't understand it without the docs to go
with it. can you create an example as a part of the Album/Artist
schema?

Clayton

Better handling of constraint failures?
dan 16:13 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Drew Taylor 17:27 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Clayton L. Scott 19:29 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Drew Taylor 19:54 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Clayton L. Scott 19:53 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Clayton L. Scott 20:01 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Perrin Harkins 19:51 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Daniel Collis Puro 20:01 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Clayton L. Scott 20:04 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Daniel Collis Puro 20:42 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Clayton Scott 21:49 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
Tony Bowden 13:52 on 24 Oct 2004