Re: 'sequence' table?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/09/20]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: 'sequence' table?
Date: 10:04 on 20 Sep 2004

On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 10:31:48AM +0100, Dave Howorth wrote:
> FWIW, I would prefer to call the table 'sequences' and the column 
> 'sequences_id', or perhaps 'sequence_id'. But I can't!

Why not?

> CDBI needs FK columns to be the same as table names. 

No, it doesn't.

> Maypole needs table names to be singular. 

As far as I know, this isn't true either.

Tony

(message missing)

'sequence' table?
Dave Howorth 16:17 on 17 Sep 2004

Re: 'sequence' table?
Charles Bailey 20:26 on 17 Sep 2004

Re: 'sequence' table?
Allen Day 06:08 on 18 Sep 2004

Re: 'sequence' table?
Tony Bowden 07:40 on 18 Sep 2004

Re: 'sequence' table?
Dave Howorth 09:31 on 20 Sep 2004

Re: 'sequence' table?
Tony Bowden 10:04 on 20 Sep 2004

Re: 'sequence' table?
Dave Howorth 12:08 on 20 Sep 2004

Re: 'sequence' table?
Tony Bowden 16:44 on 20 Sep 2004

Re: 'sequence' table?
Dave Howorth 10:14 on 21 Sep 2004