Re: Discrepancies in docs and implementation

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/10/24]

From: Tim Bunce
Subject: Re: Discrepancies in docs and implementation
Date: 18:56 on 24 Oct 2004
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 03:48:32PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 03:17:04PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> > I've changed this to:
> > 
> > 	The update() method returns the number of rows updated.  If the object had
> > 	not changed and did not to issue an UPDATE statement, we return -1. If
> > 	the record in the database has been deleted, or its primary key value
> > 	changed, then the update will not affect any records and so the update()
> > 	method will return 0.
> 
> But now that I've fixed the code here, this is out of date.
> 
> 	The update() method returns the number of rows updated.  If the object had
> 	not changed and did not to issue an UPDATE statement, we return -1.

"and did not to issue"?

Tim.

Discrepancies in docs and implementation
Kingsley Kerce 20:45 on 08 Oct 2004

Re: Discrepancies in docs and implementation
Tim Bunce 22:38 on 08 Oct 2004

Re: Discrepancies in docs and implementation
Tony Bowden 14:17 on 24 Oct 2004

Re: Discrepancies in docs and implementation
Tony Bowden 14:48 on 24 Oct 2004

Re: Discrepancies in docs and implementation
Tim Bunce 18:56 on 24 Oct 2004

Re: Discrepancies in docs and implementation
Tony Bowden 19:07 on 24 Oct 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52