Re: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/10/26]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Date: 18:38 on 26 Oct 2004

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:45:00PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> I thought that I could use ->is_changed but that thinks that the fields
> *have* been changed, maybe by the act of untainting them ?

I seem to recall discovering recently that something about is_changed()
is currently broken. I can't remember offhand what that was, though ...

Tony

Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Simon Wilcox 12:45 on 26 Oct 2004

Re: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Tony Bowden 18:38 on 26 Oct 2004

RE: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Zhuang Li 18:51 on 26 Oct 2004

RE: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Simon Wilcox 18:56 on 26 Oct 2004

RE: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Charles Bailey 19:05 on 26 Oct 2004

RE: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Kingsley Kerce 19:42 on 26 Oct 2004

Re: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Tony Bowden 08:31 on 27 Oct 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52