Re: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/10/27]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Date: 08:31 on 27 Oct 2004
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:42:46PM -0400, Kingsley Kerce wrote:
> Perhaps is_changed() should be renamed to
> set_accessors_have_been_used_since_last_update()
> because that's currently the true semantics (see the code).
> The wording "is_changed" is misleading, or at the very least ambiguous.

In the mystical world of my Column / Attribute change, each Attribute
will be able to tell you whether or not its current value is the same as
the value it fetched from the database.

The main is_changed() can then just gather that information.

Tony

Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Simon Wilcox 12:45 on 26 Oct 2004

Re: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Tony Bowden 18:38 on 26 Oct 2004

RE: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Zhuang Li 18:51 on 26 Oct 2004

RE: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Simon Wilcox 18:56 on 26 Oct 2004

RE: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Charles Bailey 19:05 on 26 Oct 2004

RE: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Kingsley Kerce 19:42 on 26 Oct 2004

Re: Class::DBI::FromCGI and is_changed
Tony Bowden 08:31 on 27 Oct 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52