Re: Class::DBI::Factory and Apache::DBI don't play nice

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/21]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: Class::DBI::Factory and Apache::DBI don't play nice
Date: 12:17 on 21 Nov 2004
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 10:12:01PM -0500, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Why is that?  Because the object index is class data but CDF is changing 
> the database underneath?  Maybe we could incorporate a unique identifier 
> for the database connection into the object index key.

That would probably be useful. I have several sites with database
switching going on that I wouldn't be able to use the current code with.

> The big issue with Apache::DBI and Ima::DBI is that Ima::DBI 
> caches the handles in closures and doesn't go back to Apache::DBI when 
> you ask for them again, so the cleanup handler with the automatic 
> rollback for transactional databases doesn't get pushed onto the stack 
> by Apache::DBI.

Any suggestions?

Tony

(message missing)

Class::DBI::Factory and Apache::DBI don't play nice
Alexander =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4fe?= 21:34 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Class::DBI::Factory and Apache::DBI don't play nice
Alexander =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4fe?= 22:35 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Class::DBI::Factory and Apache::DBI don't play nice
Alexander =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4fe?= 08:13 on 20 Nov 2004

Re: Class::DBI::Factory and Apache::DBI don't play nice
Tony Bowden 12:17 on 21 Nov 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52