Re: Is there something wrong with the combination of cdbi 0.96 and Apache 1.xx?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/14]

From: Alexander K
Subject: Re: Is there something wrong with the combination of cdbi 0.96 and Apache 1.xx?
Date: 15:32 on 14 Feb 2005
Needless to say, I've tried switching the order of the
two subclass declarations (no difference), I've tried
ommitting the "has_many" line alltogether (then the
method simply won't work in my program).

What is wrong?



--- Alexander K <karjala@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:

> I don't understand.

[...]

> ----
> options method already exists in Domain::Property
>  at
> /usr/share/perl5/Class/DBI/Relationship/HasMany.pm
> line 13
> Syntax error on line 1068 of
> /etc/apache-perl/httpd.conf:
> Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at
> /usr/share/perl5/Class/DBI/Relationship/HasMany.pm
> line 51.
> Compilation failed in require at (eval 140) line 3.
> ----



	
		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Re: Is there something wrong with the combination of cdbi 0.96 and Apache 1.xx?
Alexander K 15:32 on 14 Feb 2005

Generated at 10:23 on 16 Feb 2005 by mariachi v0.52