RE: Cascading delete issues

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/21]

From: Tony Bowden Sent: 20 February 2005 11:13
>=20
> In the dim and distant past, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > I think the on-delete behaviour should be defined with the=20
> relationship.
<snip>
>=20
> I've finally implemented this. However, I've done it in a manner that
> lets anyone write their own strategies for what they want to happen
> here.
<snip>
> This means the old, undocumented, no_cascade_delete option is now
> deprecated.

Excellent - I've been using the undocumented option for a while
now (pretty sucessfully for an untested feature ;-) but I'm going
to need some more complex behaviour soon and this sounds spot
on, and much nicer than my current thoughts.

Where can we get hold of it? Can't seem to find a ref to cvs/svn
access in the docs/wiki/archive...

Cheers,
mark
--
This email (and any attachments) is intended solely for the individual(s) t=
o whom addressed.=20
It may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information.=20
Any statement or opinions therein are not necessarily those of ITN unless s=
pecifically stated.=20
Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying is prohibited.=20
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele=
te it from your system.=20
Security and reliability of the e-mail and attachments are not guaranteed.=20
You must take full responsibility for virus checking.



Independent Television News Limited,=20

Registered No. 548648 England,

VAT Reg. No: GB 756 2995 81,=20

200 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8XZ,

Telephone: 020 7833 3000.