Re: [Fwd: Re: [CDBI] 2 Questions?]
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2005/09/15]
> If your DBD's thread safe, CDBI should be thread safe. The DBD probably
> isn't though ...
>
>> Secondly, is there a safe way to have a constructor that's called each
>> time CDBI instantiates an object? I have a trigger set on before_create
>> and select, but sometimes a class's constructor is never called, and
>> other times the constructor is called twice.
>
> Overriding 'construct' may do the trick for you.
No dice, the construct isn't called during my::class->create calls. Same
with new...perhaps there's something blindingly obvious I'm missing, but
it seems like providing user-supplied constructors would be a fairly
simple proposition.
> DBIx::Class gets round this by having a real 'new' method, which makes
> life rather simpler (and also allows objects not in the db - create is
> just a shortcut for ->new(...)->insert)
Sounds interesting. Would a transition to DBIx::Class be particuarly
difficult?
Thanks for your help-
Andrew
_______________________________________________
ClassDBI mailing list
ClassDBI@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
http://lists.digitalcraftsmen.net/mailman/listinfo/classdbi
|
Re: [Fwd: Re: [CDBI] 2 Questions?]
melo_am0 19:34 on 15 Sep 2005
|