Re: Urgent justification for perl

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/19]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: Urgent justification for perl
Date: 19:06 on 19 Nov 2004
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 07:35, Martin Moss wrote:
> Someone in the powers that be read an outdated
> description and thinks that using perl is a security
> risk - (I know, its not what you use, but how you use
> it thats the security concern). 
> 
> Any ideas?

man perlsec to start with.  There is plenty of Perl advocacy out there
on various sites if you Google for it.  If you have a specific concern
that isn't covered well elsewhere, let us know what it is.

- Perrin


        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

Urgent justification for perl
Martin Moss 12:35 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Jonathan Vanasco 18:59 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Perrin Harkins 19:06 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
John Wittkoski 20:25 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 20:52 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Steven Lembark 20:58 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Matt Sergeant 21:38 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Martin Moss 10:15 on 22 Nov 2004

Generated at 11:26 on 21 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52