Re: Urgent justification for perl
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2004/11/19]
Martin Moss wrote on 11/19/04, 7:35 AM:
> All,
>
> I've had an urgent request for a few paragraphs on the
> justification for the use of perl. In particularly
> mod_perl.
>
> Someone in the powers that be read an outdated
> description and thinks that using perl is a security
> risk - (I know, its not what you use, but how you use
> it thats the security concern).
>
> Any ideas?
Martin,
You better have one of those "powers that be" give those crazy folks at
amazon.com a call and let them know that they are using an insecure
product for their little shopping site.
Seriously though, amazon.com uses Mason
(http://www.masonhq.com/?AmazonDotCom) which uses mod_perl which uses
perl. They probably do more money based transactions per day than any
other web site (except perhaps ebay - not sure what they use), and they
trust mod_perl.
Sorry, I know that's probably not a good "reason", but it is a good example.
--John
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
 |
 |
Re: Urgent justification for perl
John Wittkoski 20:25 on 19 Nov 2004
|