Re: Urgent justification for perl

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/19]

From: John Wittkoski
Subject: Re: Urgent justification for perl
Date: 20:25 on 19 Nov 2004

Martin Moss wrote on 11/19/04, 7:35 AM:

 > All,
 >
 > I've had an urgent request for a few paragraphs on the
 > justification for the use of perl. In particularly
 > mod_perl.
 >
 > Someone in the powers that be read an outdated
 > description and thinks that using perl is a security
 > risk - (I know, its not what you use, but how you use
 > it thats the security concern).
 >
 > Any ideas?


Martin,
You better have one of those "powers that be" give those crazy folks at 
amazon.com a call and let them know that they are using an insecure 
product for their little shopping site.

Seriously though, amazon.com uses Mason 
(http://www.masonhq.com/?AmazonDotCom) which uses mod_perl which uses 
perl. They probably do more money based transactions per day than any 
other web site (except perhaps ebay - not sure what they use), and they 
trust mod_perl.

Sorry, I know that's probably not a good "reason", but it is a good example.


    --John


        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

Urgent justification for perl
Martin Moss 12:35 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Jonathan Vanasco 18:59 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Perrin Harkins 19:06 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
John Wittkoski 20:25 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 20:52 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Steven Lembark 20:58 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Matt Sergeant 21:38 on 19 Nov 2004

Re: Urgent justification for perl
Martin Moss 10:15 on 22 Nov 2004

Generated at 11:26 on 21 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52