Re: mod_perl marketing

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/30]

From: modperl
Subject: Re: mod_perl marketing
Date: 19:41 on 30 Nov 2004
Sites which get number of concurent connections of 200 or 
more have to use dual-Apache setup (you can't serve such
number of connections with a single mod_perl server with
a few G's memory.)


---------------------------------------------------------
Author:       Frank Wiles <frank@xxxxx.xxx>
Date:         Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:30:57 -0600

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:23:38 +0000
modperl@xxx.xxx wrote:

> Please let me raise a question.
> 
> In practice, people who can program in other phases usually can
> 1) program directly in C module; and 2) find that C provides
> much better a solution.
> 
> For example, the authz phase in the dual-Apache setup.
> Here the static files are served by the light Apache. A C 
> autenz handler is usually more efficient and may be a must.
> 
> The same is true for the URL re-writing phase. Most likely we 
> need the URL to be re-written for both dynamic contents and 
> static files.
> 
> So, while mod_perl is able to handle other phases, in practice,
> one may still need to go back to the C API for the best results.
> 
> In the content phase, I think the OO programming, and so
> the MVC (Model-View-Control) concept,  makes mod_perl
> much better a choice than PHP for large projects.

  I think you will find that mod_perl code is roughly the same
  speed as a comporable C Apache module.  Since mod_perl holds all of
  the code in memory we don't have a fork/compile/excute problem which
  is why most people think C is way faster than Perl.  

  I've seen non response phase handlers, written in mod_perl, handle
  better than commercial C modules.  I'm curious why you think a C
  module would be a better solution? 

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <frank@xxxxx.xxx>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------

        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

(message missing)

RE: mod_perl marketing
Adam Prime x443 16:19 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Adam Prime x443 17:00 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 17:28 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Jonathan Vanasco 17:34 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Geoffrey Young 17:40 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 18:03 on 30 Nov 2004

Authz foo (was Re: mod_perl marketing)
Geoffrey Young 18:19 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Adam Prime x443 18:23 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
modperl 19:23 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 19:30 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 19:34 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 19:39 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 19:47 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Stas Bekman 19:55 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 20:02 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Stas Bekman 20:09 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Dan Brian 20:32 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Stas Bekman 20:34 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Joe Schaefer 20:58 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Valerio_Valdez Paolini 23:22 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Jonathan Vanasco 20:12 on 30 Nov 2004

SV: mod_perl marketing
Arne Skjaerholt 20:25 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Ken Simpson 19:39 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Ken Simpson 23:00 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
modperl 19:41 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 20:05 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 19:53 on 30 Nov 2004

Generated at 11:26 on 21 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52