RE: mod_perl marketing

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/30]

From: Clayton Cottingham
Subject: RE: mod_perl marketing
Date: 19:47 on 30 Nov 2004

Heaven Sakes no

What I am saying , is if you want to open up the mod_perl market you have to
look at why people are not moving to mod_perl

This is a valid reason for not coming over to the mod_perl ranks, because
some people don't see mod_perl as being faster/better than c apps

What I am saying is that, as a marketer trying to help mod_perl, you would
take these reasons for not using mod_perl and you try to find a way to let
people know/ understand that , say in this instance,  mod_perl is comparable
with c speeds , or whatever

The point is to listen to the reasons people give for why they choose (or
choose not to) go with mod _perl and try and use that to help educate the
market



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Wiles [mailto:frank@xxxxx.xxx] 
> Sent: November 30, 2004 11:39 AM
> To: Clayton Cottingham
> Cc: modperl@xxx.xxx; modperl@xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx
> Subject: Re: mod_perl marketing
> 
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:34:31 -0800
> "Clayton Cottingham" <drfrog@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> 
> > What ever the case it's a valid position for not approaching perl, 
> > from a marketters POV
> 
>   So C is the only language that is acceptable to marketters?  Is
>   that what you are saying? 
> 
>  ---------------------------------
>    Frank Wiles <frank@xxxxx.xxx>
>    http://www.wiles.org
>  ---------------------------------
> 
> 
> --
> Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: 
> http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
> List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
> 
> 



        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

(message missing)

RE: mod_perl marketing
Adam Prime x443 16:19 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Adam Prime x443 17:00 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 17:28 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Jonathan Vanasco 17:34 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Geoffrey Young 17:40 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 18:03 on 30 Nov 2004

Authz foo (was Re: mod_perl marketing)
Geoffrey Young 18:19 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Adam Prime x443 18:23 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
modperl 19:23 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 19:30 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 19:34 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 19:39 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 19:47 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Stas Bekman 19:55 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 20:02 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Stas Bekman 20:09 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Dan Brian 20:32 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Stas Bekman 20:34 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Joe Schaefer 20:58 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Valerio_Valdez Paolini 23:22 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Jonathan Vanasco 20:12 on 30 Nov 2004

SV: mod_perl marketing
Arne Skjaerholt 20:25 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Ken Simpson 19:39 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Ken Simpson 23:00 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
modperl 19:41 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 20:05 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 19:53 on 30 Nov 2004