Re: Why MP2

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/12/15]

From: Todd Grimason
Subject: Re: Why MP2
Date: 04:37 on 15 Dec 2004

* Stas Bekman <stas@xxxxxx.xxx> [2004-12-14 19:28]:
> But we want to hear all kind of opinions here on the list. We don't bite 

I responded off-list too:

We use Redhat AS 3, which now ships apache2 as the standard
httpd. It's of course possible to run apache1/mp1 one way or another,
or maintain pre-release versions of mp2, but a release mp2 and
hopefully imminent "blessed" mp2 RPM from Redhat would greatly
simplify things for us (package management) and others with the same
requirements I'd imagine.


        -- 
        
______________________________
toddgrimason*todd-AT-slack.net



-- 
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

(message missing)

Why MP2
Jayce^ 23:19 on 13 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Stas Bekman 23:11 on 14 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Dan Brian 23:14 on 14 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Jie Gao 23:31 on 14 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
colin_e 11:57 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
colin_e 13:55 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Randy Kobes 15:24 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
colin_e 00:03 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Stas Bekman 00:28 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Todd Grimason 04:37 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Randy Kobes 03:59 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Render Web 09:34 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Randy Kobes 15:39 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Stas Bekman 19:48 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
colin_e 19:37 on 15 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Randy Kobes 06:02 on 16 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
colin_e 11:04 on 16 Dec 2004

Re: Why MP2
Randy Kobes 14:52 on 16 Dec 2004