Re: Why MP2
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2004/12/15]
I have recently switched to using ActiveState perl on my production
Solaris box as well as on my
Windows machine for several reasons, including the fact that it's
considerably easier to get PPM
working under ActiveState.
However a big disappointment when I went looking for modules was the
sorry state of
Apache::* modules under ActiveState's PPM.
Take a look at http://ppm.activestate.com/BuildStatus/5.8.html and you
will see a sea of red
for almost all the Apache modules. This is a real shame because there
are some fundamental
building-block modules, like all the ApacheAuth* and most of the session
modules down here as
broken.
I don't have a handle on the Apache/Perl structure at the moment, but I
would expect there to be a
couple of critical functions or interfaces at the root of this. Crack
those and half the list changes to
"available". Dan mentioned libapreq2. Is this one of those critical
dependencies?
Regards: Colin
>>> In preparation for the upcoming release of mod_perl2, I'd like to
>>> prepare a list of reasons why a person/company would look at using
>>> mod_perl2, specifically, why upgrade from mod_perl1, and converting
>>> from other technologies. So with that, what reasons do you have for
>>> wanting MP2? What prevented you from upgrading before?
>>> What key features are most interesting for you?
>>> How will this help your company?
>>
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
 |
(message missing)
|
 |
 |
Why MP2
Jayce^ 23:19 on 13 Dec 2004
|