Re: ModPerl::MM

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/12/28]

On Dec 28, 2004, at 2:17 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:

> David Wheeler wrote:
>
>>> why Apache::TestMB? It should be ModPerl::MB when it'll appear, 
>>> right?
>> Up to you. I used it as an example because I don't really understand  
>> how Apache::TestMM and ModPerl::MM interact.
>
> Apache::TestMM is only needed only to add 'make test' and adjust 'make 
> clean' targets.

Hrm. We'd have to take that into consideration when developing 
ModPerl::MB. I wonder if ModPerl::MM could simply inherit from 
Apache::TestMM (or vice versa)?

> Well, we talk about ModPerl::MB, which will already be there if the 
> modperl2 (version, let's say it's added in 1.99_20) is satisfied.

no problem then. Just do

   my $build = ModPerl::MB->new(...);

> So, are you sure we should even start on that effort then? If things 
> are not stable, I'd rather wait till they are stabilized.

They're stable; the debate was over another feature from EU::MM that 
wasn't ported (and won't be). But it's fresh in their minds, so it's a 
good time to ask.

Regards,

David


        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html