Re: ModPerl::MM

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/12/28]

From: Stas Bekman
Subject: Re: ModPerl::MM
Date: 21:56 on 28 Dec 2004


> what if none exists, should Module::Install be used to require 
> Module::Build?

that's a tricky one. If ModPerl::MB is added, I suppose a Build.PL writer 
should still manually require Module::Build (version) and probably ensure 
that it's installed via Module::Install, correct? Then ModPerl::MB could 
check for a specific version of it.

        -- 
        __________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@xxxxxx.xxx http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

-- 
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

(message missing)

Re: ModPerl::MM
Stas Bekman 20:58 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
David Wheeler 21:14 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
Stas Bekman 21:26 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
David Wheeler 21:42 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
Stas Bekman 21:53 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
Stas Bekman 21:56 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
David Wheeler 22:09 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
Stas Bekman 22:17 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
David Wheeler 22:27 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
Stas Bekman 22:36 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
David Wheeler 22:40 on 28 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
Perrin Harkins 00:45 on 29 Dec 2004

Re: ModPerl::MM
Stas Bekman 16:28 on 29 Dec 2004