Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/10]

From: ben syverson
Subject: Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
Date: 22:51 on 10 Feb 2005
Hi Richard,

Sorry -- I should have been more specific:

On Feb 10, 2005, at 4:40 PM, Richard F. Rebel wrote:

> How are you detecting that a process is growing by a couple megs?

Via "top" on the command line.

> Also, you mention that the processes grow by a couple megs.  By this do
> you mean that each subsequent fork is a few megs larger than the
> parents?

Each fork (and also the parent) winds up being a few megs larger when 
the hash is loaded. Right now I'm testing with 5 children, and If I 
comment out the line that loads the module which loads the hash, all 6 
processes wind up being larger.

> One more question, what mpm are you using?

Old-style pre-fork.

Thanks!

- ben

(message missing)

[mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
ben syverson 22:27 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
Richard F. Rebel 22:40 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
ben syverson 22:51 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
Richard F. Rebel 23:28 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
Perrin Harkins 23:32 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
Richard F. Rebel 00:33 on 11 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
ben syverson 23:43 on 10 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
Richard F. Rebel 00:35 on 11 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
Perrin Harkins 21:57 on 11 Feb 2005

Re: [mp1 and mp2] Grokking memory
Steven Lembark 19:39 on 13 Feb 2005

Generated at 11:21 on 20 Feb 2005 by mariachi v0.52