Re: $r->document_root

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/20]

From: Geoffrey Young
Subject: Re: $r->document_root
Date: 05:26 on 20 Feb 2005


> The question is whether we want to make that docroot change persistent
> across requests [1] or per-request[2]. Geoff's proposal matches the
> former [1]behavior, whereas Joe's the latter[2].
> 
> I tend to think that per-request[2] is the sane solution. That's because
> you can never know whether this value was already modified or not when
> you hit a new process. So you will always try to change it, in which
> case per-request[2] makes the most sense.
> 
> the only cons is that it's different from mp1 behavior, but as the above
> explains it makes no difference (I believe).

automatic per-request is definitely the way to go if we can do it - people
just don't understand the unusual scoping of this field, so helping them
along is probably best.

--Geoff

(message missing)

$r->document_root
Cahill, Earl 23:14 on 14 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 23:21 on 14 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 23:26 on 14 Feb 2005

RE: $r->document_root
Cahill, Earl 20:43 on 15 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 21:10 on 15 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 01:48 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 02:02 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 13:54 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 17:21 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Joe Schaefer 14:12 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 05:26 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 01:29 on 21 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Joe Schaefer 02:38 on 21 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 02:43 on 21 Feb 2005