Re: $r->document_root

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/21]

From: Joe Schaefer
Subject: Re: $r->document_root
Date: 02:38 on 21 Feb 2005

Stas Bekman <stas@xxxxxx.xxx> writes:

> Geoffrey Young wrote:

[...]

>> automatic per-request is definitely the way to go if we can do it -
>> people just don't understand the unusual scoping of this field, so
>> helping them along is probably best.
>
> sure, let's do that.

It might also be nice to have this method croak in a non-prefork mpm.

> Joe, would you like to merge in the code you've posted before or do
> you want me to handle that?

I can do it, but it'll take a few days for me to find the tuits.
If it's easier for you to do it sooner, please feel free to handle
it yourself.

        -- 
        Joe Schaefer

(message missing)

$r->document_root
Cahill, Earl 23:14 on 14 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 23:21 on 14 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 23:26 on 14 Feb 2005

RE: $r->document_root
Cahill, Earl 20:43 on 15 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 21:10 on 15 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 01:48 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 02:02 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 13:54 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 17:21 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Joe Schaefer 14:12 on 19 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Geoffrey Young 05:26 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 01:29 on 21 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Joe Schaefer 02:38 on 21 Feb 2005

Re: $r->document_root
Stas Bekman 02:43 on 21 Feb 2005