Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/15]

From: Philip M. Gollucci
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Date: 08:29 on 15 Apr 2005

Tom Schindl wrote:
> Why doesn't it install if mp1 is installed? Now that we have a new
> namespace that should not be a problem?

	>incompatible with all prior mod_perl 1.99 releases to date.  in

I'm hoping you read that wrong as 1.99 is actually mp2.
Please forgive me if I didn't give you enough credit -- just trying to 
state the obvious first :)

        -- 
        END
------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@xxxxxx.xxx) 301.254.5198
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Developer / Liquidity Services, Inc.
	http://www.liquidityservicesinc.com

(message missing)

[ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Geoffrey Young 13:43 on 14 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Tom Schindl 06:37 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Fred Moyer 06:43 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Tom Schindl 07:19 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Philip M. Gollucci 08:38 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Philip M. Gollucci 08:51 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Tom Schindl 09:18 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Geoffrey Young 12:55 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Philip M. Gollucci 08:29 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Tom Schindl 09:23 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Tom Schindl 09:26 on 15 Apr 2005

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.0-RC5
Philip M. Gollucci 11:17 on 15 Apr 2005