Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/19]

Slava Bizyayev wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 23:08, Scott Gifford wrote:
> 
>>... I'm just explaining why the > probably showed up.
> 
> 
> Right, I hope I've fixed this in POD original for now by joining 'From'
> line with the previous one. Luckily for me, it was not the beginning of
> the paragraph...

:)

> In common case for the future, it would probably be safer to email POD
> as *.pod.gz file, or inside the *.tar.gz, won't it?

Actually, not, as it makes it hard to review and comment on the pod.
Normally if the change is not very big it's the best to send a patch as an 
output of diff(1) against the current pod, in your case: 
http://perl.apache.org/docs/tutorials/client/compression/compression.pod.orig

        -- 
        __________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@xxxxxx.xxx http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com