Re: Web Content Compression FAQ - update

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/19]

Slava Bizyayev wrote:
> Thanks, Stas!
> On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 12:10, Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
>>Thanks Slava, committed.
>>
>>I'd further suggest to drop all =head2 strings, merging the content with 
>>the question, making the TOC even more useful and the text more readable.
> 
> 
> 
> Frankly speaking, I don't like this idea. From my point of view, it
> makes all headers mess and confusing. In current version TOC is like an
> abstract of the main text. In some cases it might be sufficient to read
> a TOC only. Again, from my point of view, it makes sense, and I would
> like to keep it as is...

Sure, let's keep it this way.

>>Also, please fix your original:
>>
>>- >From the perspective of global architecture and scalability planning,
>>+ From the perspective of global architecture and scalability planning,

> Strangely... There is no '>' in my original. Neither I find in
> attachment that I sent...

As someone has replied to me off-line, it must have been a misdoing of 
your mail client, mangling your attachments. Check the attachment that was 
received by the list. It has >From.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl&m=111383643818718&q=p3

        -- 
        __________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@xxxxxx.xxx http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com