Re: More object index weirdness

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/09/16]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: More object index weirdness
Date: 14:09 on 16 Sep 2004
On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 09:46, William McKee wrote:
> The situation I'm facing is that if I delete a record in the might_have
> relationship, it's somehow not disappearing from the object index.

I can't be sure what you mean by this.  Can you show some code?  How do
you delete the record?  How do you know it's still in the index?

> I thought that a recent discussion mentioned that the index is not a
> cache and that a db lookup is performed before it is queried.

That's correct.

> Is that
> index possibly not being updated if the record is not found and
> therefore the old record is kept around?

The old record is only kept around if you have a copy of it in memory
somewhere.

- Perrin

(message missing)

More object index weirdness
William McKee 13:46 on 16 Sep 2004

Re: More object index weirdness
Perrin Harkins 14:09 on 16 Sep 2004

Re: More object index weirdness
William McKee 15:16 on 16 Sep 2004

Re: More object index weirdness
Perrin Harkins 15:30 on 16 Sep 2004

Re: More object index weirdness
William McKee 16:19 on 16 Sep 2004

Re: More object index weirdness
Perrin Harkins 16:40 on 16 Sep 2004

Re: More object index weirdness
William McKee 17:02 on 16 Sep 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52