Re: PATCH: add_trigger()

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/10/01]

From: Edward J. Sabol
Subject: Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Date: 15:16 on 01 Oct 2004

>> You mean something like
>> 
>>        __PACKAGE__-> add_valid_trigger('my_trigger');
>
> I like the method name, so here's an updated patch.

Actually, I think "valid_trigger" would be a better method name.
"add_valid_trigger" sounds too much like "add_trigger" and the two methods
are too disparate to justify the resemblance, IMHO. Not my call though...

(message missing)

PATCH: add_trigger()
Drew Taylor 19:59 on 30 Sep 2004

Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Tony Bowden 21:20 on 30 Sep 2004

Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Edward J. Sabol 21:42 on 30 Sep 2004

Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Drew Taylor 22:15 on 30 Sep 2004

Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Edward J. Sabol 22:21 on 30 Sep 2004

Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Drew Taylor 13:51 on 01 Oct 2004

Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Tony Bowden 14:06 on 01 Oct 2004

Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Edward J. Sabol 15:16 on 01 Oct 2004

Re: PATCH: add_trigger()
Drew Taylor 14:12 on 01 Oct 2004