Re: Data validation

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/09]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: Data validation
Date: 22:08 on 09 Nov 2004

On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 15:39, Drew Taylor wrote:
> What about 0.96 requires 5.6+ functionality. If it's relatively easy
> to do and I can downgrade features gracefully, I'll provide a patch so
> later versions can work with our ancient perl version.

I don't think it does require 5.6.  The object index stuff will not work
without 5.6, but it degrades gracefully.

- Perrin

(message missing)

Data validation
Drew Taylor 20:39 on 09 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Drew Taylor 20:44 on 09 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Perrin Harkins 22:08 on 09 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Drew Taylor 22:14 on 09 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Edward J. Sabol 23:20 on 09 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Drew Taylor 01:15 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Dan Sully 01:40 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Perrin Harkins 06:42 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Dan Sully 06:59 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Drew Taylor 14:56 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Drew Taylor 15:03 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Perrin Harkins 22:03 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Kingsley Kerce 14:38 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Drew Taylor 15:17 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Tony Bowden 19:28 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Perrin Harkins 21:20 on 10 Nov 2004

Re: Data validation
Cees Hek 23:52 on 10 Nov 2004