Re: No overload magic

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/16]

From: Ofer Nave
Subject: Re: No overload magic
Date: 21:53 on 16 Feb 2005

Karjala wrote:

> It's been said before on this list 
> (http://www.spanner.org/lists/cdbi/2004/09/15/7c3cf0f4.html)
>
> ...but I'd like to offer my feedback also.
>
> When I do comparisons between CDBI objects ($obj1 == $obj2), it worked 
> fine under cdbi 0.95 (it compared their keys), but it only sometimes 
> works under cdbi 0.96 (the rest of the times, it causes the error 
> message described in the linked message above).
>
> I think this is a bug.
>
> P.S. I use Mason just like the above user.

I thought that CDBI only ever keeps one copy of each object in memory 
(indexed by primary key), so how would you have have two objects with 
the same primary key to make an equality operator useful?

I'm obviously missing something important.  :)

-ofer

No overload magic
Karjala 07:55 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Karjala 08:01 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
William Ross 10:05 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Michael G Schwern 11:25 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Tony Bowden 14:10 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
William Ross 14:20 on 17 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Michael G Schwern 06:43 on 18 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Tony Bowden 08:21 on 18 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Tim Bunce 09:43 on 18 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Karjala 11:57 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
William Ross 13:52 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Karjala 14:09 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Michele Valzelli 11:59 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Ofer Nave 21:53 on 16 Feb 2005

Re: No overload magic
Ken.Olstad 22:00 on 16 Feb 2005