Re: Inflate a boolean

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/20]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: Inflate a boolean
Date: 23:35 on 20 Feb 2005

On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 11:47:01PM +0100, Johan Lindstrom wrote:
> >>But, most of the time, if you really want "yes" and "no", store those
> >>in your database, not 1 and 0.
> >That is entirely subjective, and most definitely poor design (in my 
> >opinion) in many cases.
> Me too. Possibly there would be a value table for that to achieve 3NF.

A table that maps the key "yes" to the value "yes", and the key "no"
to the value "no"?

Tony

(message missing)

Inflate a boolean
adtim 09:08 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Ofer Nave 09:22 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 09:44 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
a.d.tim 10:35 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 11:15 on 20 Feb 2005

Re[2]: Inflate a boolean
a.d.tim 12:37 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Perrin Harkins 21:15 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Ofer Nave 21:40 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 22:07 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Ofer Nave 22:24 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Johan Lindstrom 22:47 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 23:35 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Johan Lindstrom 00:20 on 21 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 09:31 on 21 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= 21:25 on 21 Feb 2005